Questions? +1 (202) 335-3939 Login
Trusted News Since 1995
A service for food industry professionals · Tuesday, April 30, 2024 · 707,682,811 Articles · 3+ Million Readers

Supreme Court Declines to Review Class Certification of ATM Operator Class in Antitrust Case Against Mastercard and Visa

Orange and gray logo for MoginRubin antitrust law firm.

Antitrust law firm MoginRubin LLP announces advancement of class action litigation against Visa, Mastercard.

SCOTUS declines review of certification of a class of independent ATM Operators and two consumer classes in long-running case against Visa, Mastercard.

Mastercard and Visa tried to claim that there was some circuit conflict over the law governing the evidentiary standards for certifying a class. That’s just not true.”
— Jonathan Rubin
WASHINGTON, DC, USA, April 16, 2024 /EINPresswire.com/ -- An antitrust case brought by a nationwide class of independent (non-bank) ATM Operators can move forward against Visa and Mastercard after the Supreme Court denied the bankcard companies’ petition for certiorari review of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ 2023 decision affirming the district court’s certification of the three classes.

The ATM Operators, represented by MoginRubin LLP, a specialty antitrust law firm, allege that Visa and Mastercard network rules violate the Sherman Antitrust Act.

The appeals court found that all three classes satisfied the requirement of the rules for class actions, including the requirement that common questions must predominate over individualized issues.

“The petition was not well-founded,” said Jonathan Rubin, counsel for the ATM Operator class. “Mastercard and Visa tried to claim that there was some circuit conflict over the law governing the evidentiary standards for certifying a class. That’s just not true. The federal law on class certification has been well-settled for several years now,” Rubin said. “In light of that,” he said, “the Supreme Court’s rejection of the petition seemed to be obvious.”

The Independent Operator Class is represented by Jonathan Rubin, Dan Mogin, Tim LaComb, and Joy Sidhwa of MoginRubin LLP. The case is National ATM Council Inc., et al. v. Visa Inc., et al., No. 1:11-CV-01803-RJL, (D.D.C., filed October 12, 2011); No. 21-7109 (D.C. Cir., 2023); No. 23-814 (Sup. Ct.).

MoginRubin LLP is a leading antitrust and competition law firm prepared to meet today’s most demanding challenges in litigation, strategic counseling, and policy advocacy. The firm’s legal and economic expertise, built by litigating some of the nation’s landmark cases, means its clients get the clarity, focus, and commitment they need when faced with high-stakes legal issues.

Shannon Bouche
MoginRubin LLP
+1 619-687-6611
info@moginrubin.com
Visit us on social media:
LinkedIn

Powered by EIN Presswire


EIN Presswire does not exercise editorial control over third-party content provided, uploaded, published, or distributed by users of EIN Presswire. We are a distributor, not a publisher, of 3rd party content. Such content may contain the views, opinions, statements, offers, and other material of the respective users, suppliers, participants, or authors.

Submit your press release